Using electroencephalogram (EEG) electrodes attached to the scalps of 25 student subjects, a team led by psychology doctoral student David E. Anderson captured synchronized neuron activity while they held a simple oriented bar located within a circle in short-term memory.
The team, by monitoring these alpha rhythms, was able to decode the precise angle of the bar the subjects were locking onto and use that brain activity to predict which individuals could store memories with the highest quality or precision.
Although past research has decoded thoughts via brain activity, standard approaches are expensive and limited in their ability to track fast-moving mental representations, says Edward Awh, a professor in the department of psychology and Institute of Neuroscience.
Tuning functions constructed from spatially distributed oscillatory alpha activity are shown during the storage of a single oriented line in visual working memory. Early transient peaks (top) and later sustained peaks (bottom) correspond to distinct stimulus-specific patterns of neural activity observed during stimulus encoding and storage, respectively. (Credit: U. Oregon)
The new findings show that EEG measures of synchronized neural activity can precisely track the contents of memory at almost the speed of thought, he says:
“These findings provide strong evidence that these electrical oscillations in the alpha frequency band play a key role in a person’s ability to store a limited number of items in working memory.
By identifying particular rhythms that are important to memory, we’re getting closer to understanding the low-level building blocks of this really limited cognitive ability. If this rhythm is what allows people to hold things in mind, then understanding how that rhythm is generated—and what restricts the number of things that can be represented—may provide insights into the basic capacity limits of the mind.”
The findings come from a basic research project led by Awh and coauthor Edward K. Vogel that seeks to understand the limits of storing information.
“It turns out that it’s quite restricted,” Awh says. “People can only think about a couple of things at a time, and they miss things that would seem to be extremely obvious and memorable if that limited set of resources is diverted elsewhere.”
Past work, mainly using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has established that brain activity can track the content of memory. EEG, however, provides a much less expensive approach and can track mental activity with much a higher temporal resolution of about one-tenth of a second compared to about five seconds with fMRI.
“With EEG we get a fine-grained measure of the precise contents of memory, while benefitting from the superior temporal resolution of electrophysiological measures,” Awh says. “This EEG approach is a powerful new tool for tracking and decoding mental representations with high temporal resolution. It should provide us with new insights into how rhythmic brain activity supports core memory processes.”